I part of the John Stewart generation. Despite originally hating him as Criag Kilborn’s replacement, I’ve grown to admire his political attitude which was best summarized in his crossfire debate.
In summary, politics, the media, and the American people are suffering from self-imposed division. It keeps this country from moving forward.
This is why Obama has been so refreshing. He seems to actually want to unite people. And, despite changing his position on public financing, I think he really means it.
Today, you might have noticed the seemingly heated exchange between Dobson and Obama.
In my opinion, it highlights Obama’s challenges with being a uniter.
Challenges
It’s very clear that Dobson is projecting his views on the senator onto what Obama said. Obama has a very liberal voting record, especially on abortion. But Obama was not taking a stance on abortion, gay rights, or guns. He wasn’t saying faith should be removed from someone’s decision making process. Obama was giving the faithful a blueprint for success in the ‘enlightened’ 21st century.
Secular arguments
A ’secular’ position is only secular because it has the strongest rational arguments. If religious people can make secular arguments, like they eventually did with slavery, and equal rights (MLK), they have a much stronger chance at public policy.
Resorting to “God told us so” is not going to play out in public policy. Obama is giving instructions on how religious leaders can find common ground. Maybe if Dobson listened to him, he would be more effective at his pro-choice efforts.
Unfair comparison
Dobson distorts Obama’s words in the way he is accuses Obama of distorting the bible. Obama didn’t compare Dobson with Sharpton. In fact he used their differences to provide more evidence for his point - that people interpret their religion very differently.
Great experiement
Obama’s campaign is a great experiment on the American people. I disagree with most of his economic stances. But I can’t get over the fact that he is always well reasoned in his public discourse. I’m hoping that there are other Americans who can recognize the importance of voting for the a man that represents something, other than the opinions that will get him elected.